Call for reform on family asset transfers
Accounting firm HLB Mann Judd has recommended the Federal Government examine the current taxes levied on the transfer of assets between generations as part of its impending taxation review to allow for easier retirement planning.
“With longer life expectancies, these days people are transferring assets under their will to their children when they are in retirement themselves,” HLB Mann Judd Sydney managing partner and tax adviser Tony Fittler said.
At the moment families who initiate intergenerational asset transfers are liable to pay stamp duty and capital gains tax (CGT) on the transactions unless they qualify for concessions under the small business CGT rules.
Often the situation means families will have to make a choice to either sell off other assets to fund their CGT obligations, or defer the transfer until the parents pass away, a situation where CGT and stamp duty no longer apply.
“If the Federal Government changed the CGT rules, so that they were the same for intergenerational transfers as they are on death, it would enable parents to help their children financially at a time when they really need it,” Fittler said.
However, Fittler explained he is not advocating for CGT and stamp duty on family assets to be scrapped altogether, but rather levied only when the items in question were sold to an external third party.
“If intergenerational transfers qualified for the same relief that apply to asset transfers on death, the children could defer CGT until assets were sold to a third party,” he said.
“So our suggested reform will not reduce the tax paid either in CGT or stamp duty, but simply postpone it until an asset is sold outside the family,” Fittler added.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
