Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Call for product rationalisation

compliance/platforms/IFSA/financial-services-industry/superannuation-fund/superannuation-funds/financial-services-association/treasury/life-insurance/

26 September 2007
| By George Liondis |
image
image image
expand image

Richard Gilbert

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has called for the rationalisation of ‘legacy products’, which includes certain financial products such as managed investment schemes, superannuation fund and deposit funds, and has lodged a submission to the Treasury in relation to the Product Rationalisation Issues Paper released in late June.

IFSA said both consumers and the industry would be better off with a single permanent rationalisation mechanism, or a ‘one-stop shop’. It contends that financial products such as managed investment schemes, superannuation funds, approved deposit funds, pooled superannuation trusts, retirement savings accounts and life insurance products can eventually all be categorised as ‘legacy’ products.

IFSA CEO Richard Gilbert said that the rationalisation of legacy products accommodated the ongoing evolution of the financial services industry and enabled the product provider to act in the interests of customers.

“The submission states that a range of commercial drivers may exist for the termination of a financial product and our industry needs relief so that the rationalisation process is tax neutral for consumers,” he said.

“IFSA has found cases where there are products with a just a single member or handful of people left in them, yet all the associated compliance and administration burden remains. Clearly this is economically unviable and in any case, the member or members would undoubtedly be better off and at less risk in a more modern product offering.”

“Our submission recognises that it should be the product provider who will bear the costs of the rationalisation process and that there should be ‘no net detriment’ provisions for the investor,” Gilbert said.

IFSA’s submission stated that types of financial products suitable for rationalisation should include products that are administered on old technology platforms, are not economically viable or have been made redundant through duplication.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND