Call for equal AFSL fees for unlisted and listed product recommendations
Ensuring planning licensees get paid the same for recommending an unlisted managed fund or a listed security would result in a better deal for consumers by forcing greater price competition between the products, according to Puzzle Financial Advice director Bruce Baker.
“The conflicts of interest of the planning licensees are a far more powerful source of tainted advice than the conflicts of interest of individual financial planners," Baker said in a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services' current Inquiry into Financial Products and Services in Australia.
His submission, 'Reducing Costs of Advice and Funds Management for Consumers', sought to “provide solutions to the problem” of high total fees on super guarantee contributions.
Baker added “breaking down the existing distribution channels for unlisted managed funds” would also help to “force much greater price competition between inexpensive listed securities and expensive listed securities, such as shares, [listed investment companies] and [exchange traded funds]”.
He called for a system for consumers to transact unlisted funds and super with the same simplicity and low cost as buying a share through E-trade or CommSec.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
