Call for equal AFSL fees for unlisted and listed product recommendations
Ensuring planning licensees get paid the same for recommending an unlisted managed fund or a listed security would result in a better deal for consumers by forcing greater price competition between the products, according to Puzzle Financial Advice director Bruce Baker.
“The conflicts of interest of the planning licensees are a far more powerful source of tainted advice than the conflicts of interest of individual financial planners," Baker said in a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services' current Inquiry into Financial Products and Services in Australia.
His submission, 'Reducing Costs of Advice and Funds Management for Consumers', sought to “provide solutions to the problem” of high total fees on super guarantee contributions.
Baker added “breaking down the existing distribution channels for unlisted managed funds” would also help to “force much greater price competition between inexpensive listed securities and expensive listed securities, such as shares, [listed investment companies] and [exchange traded funds]”.
He called for a system for consumers to transact unlisted funds and super with the same simplicity and low cost as buying a share through E-trade or CommSec.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
