Call to curb ASIC’s powers
The Rule of Law Institute of Australia (ROLIA) is strongly opposing amendments to the Corporations Act which would have the effect of increasing the powers of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
In a submission to the Senate Economics Committee, the ROLIA has warned that the changes outlined in the Corporations Law Amendment Bill No 1 of 2010 would confer even more coercive powers on ASIC and said this was a concern in circumstances where the Parliament had seemed to be unaware of ASIC’s existing powers.
“Conferring additional powers on a regulatory agency is a serious matter,” the submission said. “First, the Parliament needs to be assured that the regulator will not act in an arbitrary manner. Second, it is important that the community respect the actions of a regulator.”
The submission then raised the issue of answers provided by ASIC to Senate Estimates revealing that the regulator had issued more than 18,600 coercive orders during the last three years and said the use of coercive powers needed to be accompanied by demonstrated capability improvement and performance monitoring.
The ROLIA submission argues that the exercise of ASIC’s coercive powers should remain subject to appropriate safeguards, particularly its ability to apply for search warrants.
It said that under the existing legislative proposals, ASIC would be permitted to obtain a search warrant in circumstances where no breach of the Corporation Act or any other law had occurred.
“The power of ASIC to obtain a search warrant under the Crimes Act 1914 for suspected criminal contraventions should be sufficient,” the submission said. “The creeping expansion in coercive powers given to ASIC should be stopped until it has been carefully reviewed.”
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
