Call for better comparability of super performance
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for common standards to be applied to superannuation fund investment options and definitions so that fund performance can be more easily compared.
The ASFA call has come on the back of the latest Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) fund level data, which was described by the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) as being virtually meaningless but lauded by the Industry Super Network as proof of the outperformance of industry funds.
The APRA data, released yesterday, covered the period to the end of June last year, thus missing at least six months to the end of December during which equity markets recovered, assisting retail master trusts to outperform industry funds.
However, ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos called for better comparability of fund data saying members deserved to have information presented to them in a clear and simple format so they could better understand the level of risk in their portfolio and be able to compare different investment options across funds.
“Members also deserve to know what their fund is paying to manage the underlying assets,” she said.
Vamos said ASFA would be calling on the Cooper Review to set out requirements for funds regarding how they disclosed investment returns, levels of risk and fees.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while being unregistered.
Rather than taking a controlling approach, the latest generation of overseas private equity deals is helping advice firms to achieve their growth ambitions, three commentators have said.
Private wealth firm Fitzpatricks Group has appointed a newly created head of product, who previously spent 20 years at CFS, to bolster its range of investment options.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written direction after advice regarding non-concessional contributions meant an individual was forced to withdraw over $330,000 from their super.
