Calculating the accuracy of calculators
The web calculators provided by superannuation funds and other financial institutions to attract and retain members aren’t always all they are cracked up to be, according to research released this month by actuarial firm Rice Warner.
Rice Warner undertook an examination of the various calculators and came up with the following conclusions:
• not all funds update their calculators regularly to keep up with legislative change;
• the diversity of results produced from a given set of assumptions varies widely from calculator to calculator, illustrating the wide range of assumptions and methodologies employed by various calculators;
• the most common type of calculators to appear on websites are superannuation, retirement and combined superannuation and retirement calculators; and
• a small number of calculators do not conform to ASIC requirements, for example, not allowing the user to change default values.
According to the Rice Warner data, there can be a substantial variance in the results of projected account balances at retirement age provided by the calculators and, interestingly, the calculator provided by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission appears to fall in the middle of the range.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
