BT takes payment push to Canberra

bt financial group dealer groups commissions platforms financial advice industry BT government treasury

17 May 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

BT Financial Group, the dominant player in the investment platform market, is consulting with the Government and regulators about potential reforms in the financial advice industry in an effort to convince legislators that investment platforms are service, rather than product, providers.

Defining platforms as services providers would mean payments from platforms to dealer groups would be excluded from any legislative ban on commissions to advisers or product-specific volume rebates to licensees.

John Shuttleworth, the head of BT Financial Group’s platforms business, which encapsulates both the BT and Asgard platforms, visited Treasury officials in Canberra recently to discuss the proposed changes. The group has also been in continuing close contact with the Minister for Financial Services, Chris Bowen, and the heads of the Government’s reviews into the superannuation and advice industries, Jeremy Cooper and Bernie Ripoll.

The group argued volume rebates between platforms and dealer groups did not create conflict, and pointed to

the fact that the payments are product agnostic and represent fee discounting at a business to business level, and as such did not directly influence adviser actions.

Shuttleworth said some Treasury and other government and regulatory officials were coming to the view that platforms represent a custodial service, and did not impact the relationship between advisers and investors. On coming to that conclusion, officials “start to appreciate that there’s some work they need to do to make sure that when they implement the legislation, they don’t create unintended consequences that mean the industry can’t function effectively”.

“You can’t run a platform without a dealer group,” Shuttleworth said.

“[Dealer groups] are talking to the customers, entering all the information around the investments, they’re doing service and somewhere along the way they have to get paid for that. Whether they’re paid a fee as part of an admin fee or whether they charge that separately, they’ve got to get paid for it.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS