BT seeks to rectify New Zealand gaffe

bt-financial-group/fund-managers/money-management/

15 November 2004
| By Craig Phillips |

BT Financial Group has contacted up to 50,000 New Zealand investors to notify them of its intention to return to the High Court in Wellington and hopefully conclude an ongoing saga that began after the funds management group breached NZ Securities Commission requirements.

The issue related to a number of BT funds that had not issued prospectuses to the Commission despite the requirement for Australian Registered Managed Investment Schemes (ARMIS) to do so under the NZ Securities Act 1978. The oversight meant all investments were void and investors were entitled to a reimbursement of their original investment, plus a 10 per cent per annum interest charge, as reported in Money Management in July 2003.

However, the Act was amended back in April to allow fund managers to seek ‘reflective’ validation from a Court and avoid the costly exercise of repaying investors.

“BT intends to apply to the High Court for relief orders under the new law validating all such securities, including those you hold or have held. If successful you will be restored to the position in which you would have been had BT originally complied with the Exemption Notice requirements,” BT wrote in its letter to investors.

Investors have two options. Those believing they have been materially prejudiced by the breaches can object to the relief orders, however, this must be done by Tuesday, November 9, with a requirement for investors to outline exactly how they feel they have been prejudiced.

Alternatively, investors can do nothing and the High Court will make relief orders validating the affected securities.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 days 1 hour ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND