Brokers caught out by new policy

commissions/insurance/compliance/financial-services-reform/

28 August 2000
| By David Chaplin |

Insurance brokers must act now to implement a compliance infrastructure to meet the demands of the ASIC policy statement 161 according to Paul Harding-Davis head of the Financial Services Reform project team at Zurich Financial Services.

Insurance brokers must act now to implement a compliance infrastructure to meet the demands of the ASIC policy statement 161 according to Paul Harding-Davis head of the Financial Services Reform project team at Zurich Financial Services.

Harding-Davis says most brokers are under the false impression that they have un-til two years from the enactment of the Financial Services Reform Bill (FSRB) be-fore having to comply with new regulations.

“There is a general perception amongst brokers that there is no rush,” Harding-Davis says.

“However, PS161 has been in force since July this year and ASIC has already stated it will monitor the industry closely to make sure it complies.”

He says the policy dictates that the relationship between the broker and their sub-agent must be completely transparent.

“Under the new licensing regime, the broker must be able to demonstrate that he or she ‘owns’ the client information. Historically, this hasn’t always been the case, and creates some real challenges for managing relationships in the marketplace,” Harding-Davis says.

“Brokers also need to be reminded that undisclosed payments for referred leads from other professional firms amount to secret commissions, which are illegal.”

Harding-Davis says there is a need for a rapid “cultural change” in the industry to catch up with regulatory requirements.

Head of distribution Steve Newnham warns that brokers who fail to instigate a satisfactory compliance process for their authorised representatives may suffer se-rious consequences.

“The bottom line is that if your subagent is seen to be behaving like a broker, your registration may be revoked or simply not renewed again,” Newham says.

“Likewise, the subagent will be in breach of the Insurance (Agents and Brokers) Act for operating as an unregistered broker.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS