Bloch takes parting shot at Rudd Government

commissions/government/financial-planning/cooper-review/super-funds/FPA/chief-executive/

25 March 2010
| By Benjamin Levy |
image
image image
expand image

The outgoing chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch, has criticised the three government reviews as a “hodgepodge” of issues and pointed to government interference as a major cause of leaking super funds.

In a question and answer session at the FPA Small Principals’ Conference, Bloch said the Government was trying to put every issue that had ever been a problem on the table “just in case someone has a question down the track”, but 98 per cent of the issues they are looking at have already been solved.

The lack of focus meant the reviews had lost sight of real problems of superannuation, she said.

She also criticised the first Cooper Review report for not mentioning the cost of government interference and tax changes to the super regime over the years.

“The leakages that Jeremy Cooper sees [in super] are commissions, of course, inefficiencies in terms of structure, of course, and not one mention of the cost of all the government changes over the years. How bizarre is that?

“Have you ever had a year in financial planning where something hasn’t changed in super? Can you name a year where something hasn’t changed from Canberra?” she asked the audience.

Bloch also suggested that the current government did not entirely support the first Cooper Review report because of its lack of response to it.

“[Cooper] was appointed by the previous Minister for Superannuation. The current Minister for Superannuation has ended up with this review, and you’ll note with great interest that the current minister has not commented on that first report. Now usually what happens is that a report is made and the Government quickly says, ‘Wasn’t that fantastic? We’re very pleased and we’ll come back to you’. Nothing [has been said].

“I think that says the Government has ended up with something that was [not created by them] and it will certainly have to justify the cost of having [who] knows how many people sitting in them.”

The FPA also did not agree with Cooper’s assumption that most members in default funds were disengaged, Bloch said.

The Government does not need to tell planners how to change the direction of the industry, she added.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo