Bill Shorten fingers financial advisers on Trio Capital
Self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees need to consider paying a levy to be able to access the same compensation arrangements as people in Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated funds, according to the Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten.
Reacting on national television to the findings of the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) inquiry into the collapse of Trio Capital, Shorten did not back away from his earlier comments that SMSF trustees caught up in the collapse had been "swimming outside the flags".
As well, the Minister continued to apportion a good deal of blame to financial planners who he said had pushed clients towards the Trio investment vehicles on the basis of the sizeable commissions they would receive.
Shorten's strong line on the need for SMSF trustees to contribute to a compensation levy, and on financial planners, came despite the PJC laying considerable blame at the feet of the financial services regulators - the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
As well, the PJC recommended that ASIC fund the pursuit of further action against those involved in the Trio collapse.
For its part, the Federal Opposition has urged the Government to adopt the PJC's recommendations, particularly the extension of compensation arrangements for those people who were moved out of APRA-regulated funds and into an unprotected environment as a result of receiving bad financial advice.
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive Mark Rantall claimed the PJC's key findings were "a blunt prompt to financial regulators and product manufacturers to demonstrably lift protection and disclosure standards in the interest of protecting Australians from further fraudulent actions and criminal attack on their life savings".
"Today's findings from the Parliamentary Joint Committee review of the collapse of Trio Capital remind us that the client-first principle must apply as an iron-clad undertaking by all industry participants and those who oversee the sector," Rantall said.
However he said the PJC had acknowledged the collapse of Trio had not resulted from a failure of advice but, rather, "was a premeditated and sophisticated fraud, which went undetected over years".
Recommended for you
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.
An adviser has received a written reprimand from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after failing to meet his CPD requirements, the panel’s first action since June.
While efficiency remains a top priority for Australian advisers, State Street has revealed the profession is now juggling this desire with the need to maintain personalisation of its service offering.
A possible acquisition of data provider Iress is becoming a greater likelihood after the firm announced it is engaging with multiple interested parties.
