BFP backs FPA on separating products from advice

ASIC compliance financial planning FOFA super funds FPA financial services industry financial planning association financial advice financial planner

10 June 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A structural flaw had allowed financial product manufacturers (banks, insurers and super funds) to "dress up" the provision of information regarding their products, and the selling of their products by employees, agents, or representatives of their licensees, as "advice", according to the Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group (BFP).

The BFP has made the claim at the same time as backing the Financial Planning Association's (FPA's) Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) 10 point plan and particularly the separation of product sales from advice.

The BFP executive, meeting on Friday, said it fully endorsed the 10 point plan, with its president, Wayne Roggero saying the organisation believed the plan not only contained the steps necessary to move forward as a profession but also to provide protection for Austrlaian consumers.

He said the BFP always believed that the FSR regime contained a structural flaw in allowing financial product manufacturers (banks, insurers and super funds) to "dress up" the provision of information regarding their products, and the selling of their products by employees, agents, or representatives of their licensees, as "advice".

"These financial institutions have continually used this "advice" as a "loss leader" to direct funds to, or retain funds in, their own financial products or platforms," Roggero said.

He said there had been numerous surveys released in recent years highlighting that consumers receiving advice through AFSLs owned by product manufacturers mistakenly thought they were dealing with "independent" advisers and the BFP had repeatedly called for clearer disclosure of the ultimate owner of an AFSL to allow consumers to make an informed choice.

Roggero said the BFP also supported the call for the introduction of an ASIC register for all Financial Planners which it believed would allow Licensees to be able to confirm the employment history of a Financial Planner, something which was currently difficult where a planner had been an employee representative.

He said that while the BFP maintained the FOFA reforms included important consumer protection measures, these had been overwhelmed by poor drafting and unnecessary regulation, and they failed to address the structural flaws in the financial services industry.

"As such, FOFA remains a work-in-progress requiring immediate remedial attention to reduce red tape, so that our members can continue to provide cost-effective advice to Australian consumers and small businesses," Roggero said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 4 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

4 days 1 hour ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS