Bendigo and Adelaide rebut Great Southern reprise

Bendigo-Bank/Adelaide-Bank/

31 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

If investors in the collapsed Great Southern agricultural managed investment scheme claimed tax deductions on the loans they took out to fund their investments then it follows they could not have been fraudulent loans, according to Bendigo and Adelaide Bank.

In a strong rebuttal of media suggestions that it had acted harshly with investors impacted by the 2009 collapse of the agricultural managed investment scheme, Bendigo and Adelaide claimed it was most unlikely any of the loans were fraudulent because taking out a loan was optional and because borrowers received significant up-front tax deductions.

The banking group said that it had not acted in an aggressive or unethical manner in its dealing with Great Southern investors and rejected any such accusations.

“The bank is not responsible for the inappropriate advice and fraudulent loans provided by some advisors,” it said. “The bank provided no financial advice to any investor or borrower that invested in the Great Southern schemes, and the loan application signed by the borrower recommended they obtain their own independent legal, accounting and taxation advice regarding both investment and borrowing.”

Bendigo and Adelaide also pointed out that while a class action had been filed against the bank on behalf of investors in many schemes managed by Great Southern, the lead plaintiffs had moved prior to judgement for settlement.

“Their willingness to settle reflected the weak case they pursued, best summed up by Justice Croft’s view; ‘there does not seem to be a clearer example of where a party breaches its overreaching obligation to ensure that any claims is brought before the court has a proper basis …’,” the banking group said.

Bendigo and Adelaide confirmed that as at 31 December, 1033 borrowers (87 per cent) still owed $86.1 million to the bank but claimed that the vast majority had made arrangements to repay following the Supreme Court of Victoria approval of a settlement deed concluding the class action in 2014.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months 2 weeks ago

BlackRock Australia plans to launch a Bitcoin ETF later this month, wrapping the firm’s US-listed version which is US$85 billion in size....

3 weeks ago

The central bank has released its decision on the official cash rate following its November monetary policy meeting. ...

3 weeks ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

5 days 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo