Bendigo and Adelaide Bank small business contract terms declared unfair

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank ASIC banking

1 June 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Several terms within six small business contracts used by Bendigo and Adelaide Bank have been declared unfair by the Federal Court of Australia, following an investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC said the contracts were standard form small business loan contracts which the bank entered into with its customers after 12 November, 2016. The regulator was also successful in having the court declare the same terms as unfair in other standard form small business contracts.

An ASIC announcement said the bank would give an undertaking to the court not to use or rely on any of the impugned terms in a manner that was unfair, or cause customers to suffer loss or damage.

Justice Gleeson said the unfair terms:

  • Caused a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract;
  • Were not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank; and
  • Would cause detriment to the small businesses if the terms were relied on.

“ASIC’s investigation revealed that some of the unfair terms gave the bank broad discretion to unilaterally vary the terms and conditions of the contract without giving the borrower advance notice, or an opportunity to exit the contract without penalty,” the announcement said.

“Other terms allowed the bank to take disproportionate actions in response to a breach by the borrower, for example, by calling a default without giving the borrower an opportunity to remedy a breach, or by calling a default based on events that do not present any material risk to the bank.”

The court also ordered the terms to be void from the outset, and that the unfair terms be replaced.

ASIC Commissioner Sean Hughes said: “Yesterday’s judgment shows that ASIC will take the necessary steps to enforce the law. Importantly, insurance firms should be preparing to extend these obligations in insurance contracts.

“We are pleased the Government backed us with additional funding that was ear-marked to enforce this area of the law.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS