Benchmarking has flaws
Some fund managers who have a “fascination” with building portfolios around benchmarks are leaving their investors underexposed to certain growth areas as a result, according to Aberdeen’s senior investment specialist for offshore funds, Stuart James.
Speaking to Money Management, James hit out at the popularity of the MSCI World Index among international fund managers, saying that fund managers who used the index to build a benchmark portfolio for their clients weren’t giving their investors the right exposure in growth countries.
“Some fund managers have a fascination with building portfolios around benchmarks, and the MSCI world is a developed market benchmark, and the problem with benchmarks is that they’re backward looking because they’re based on market capitalisation. The benchmark reflects where the biggest companies in the world are ... and the biggest companies in the world have been in the developed markets,” he said.
“That doesn’t help me sitting here today because I want to know where the biggest companies and the best companies are going to be in the future,” James said.
The MSCI World Index, which benchmark fund managers used most commonly, had a no allocation to emerging markets, and it left investors underexposed to growth markets, he said.
The benchmark should be thrown in the bin, he added.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
