To benchmark, or not to benchmark?
Aberdeen Asset Management senior investment manager Andrew Preston has dispelled what he calls the myth that benchmarks are a good starting point for investing.
Speaking at the PortfolioConstruction Conference yesterday, Preston said that while benchmarks provided information about past performance, they were unable to tell investors about the prospects or worth of companies.
“Benchmarks don’t tell investors anything about the quality of companies; are they good or bad companies, what is their management like, what is their history?” he said.
Preston also argued that benchmarks do not reflect world productivity and that biggest wasn’t always best.
“Large companies don’t always prove to be the best investment; sometimes medium to small companies do better, but indexing or benchmark investing leads you to the larger companies.”
Preston suggested a better investment strategy would be to focus on high quality companies, adding that perhaps advisers should be looking for fund managers that were benchmark aware and not benchmark driven.
Recommended for you
Far too few wealth managers are capitalising on the opportunity presented by disruptive technology to deliver personalised investment solutions to the mass affluent demographic, according to PwC.
With over half of advisers using managed accounts, HUB24’s head of managed portfolios has unpacked the benefits driving their usage and how they can be leveraged by advice practices.
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
ASX-listed platforms HUB24, Netwealth, and Praemium have used their AGMs to detail how they are using artificial intelligence to improve their processes and the innovative opportunities it presents.
