BEAR will impact bank wealth divestments
The Government’s Bank Executive Accountability Regime looks certain to impact the plans of the major banks to offload the wealth management and insurance arms of their operations, particularly if they intend to retain a stake in the operations.
As the ANZ contemplates floating elements of its wealth division, the Commonwealth Bank considers the future of its business and as National Australia Bank (NAB) retains a stake in MLC Life, the BEAR legislation explanatory memorandum makes clear that they may still be captured.
The wording of the explanatory memorandum suggests the safest route for the banks may be a total exit of some operations in circumstances where it said “consumers often associate the wide range of financial services and activities provided by subsidiaries under an ADI’s [bank’s] brand.
“Poor behaviour in a subsidiary can have a negative effect on the ADI’s brand and public standing and has the potential to undermine confidence in the ADI itself. Where the activities of a subsidiary are significant, then an accountable person should have responsibility for that subsidiary.”
The explanatory memorandum then explicitly states: “This is intended to capture, for example, large insurance or wealth management arms of an ADI. If an ADI’s wealth management arm acts in breach of BEAR obligations, then it may adversely affect the prudential standing or reputation of the ADI”.
The explanatory memorandum also makes clear that the new legislation will also capture foreign-owned banks, stating: “The BEAR applies to foreign ADIs. A foreign ADI is not subject to the BEAR for its offshore operations or for any locally incorporated non-ADI subsidiaries”.”
Given the breadth of the new legislation, the major banks are complaining that a seven day consultation period is not long enough for them to give their views on the draft legislation.
The Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA) chief executive, Anna Bligh has complained that the seven-day consultation period around the bill is “grossly inadequate” and represents “playing fast and loose with a critical sector of the economy”.
Urging the Government to extend the consultation period, Bligh said this was necessary to allow proper due diligence to ensure the objective of improving senior executive accountability was met.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
