BEAR legislation already subject to Senate review
The Government’s legislation underpinning the Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) has been referred to the Senate Economics Committee.
The legislation, introduced to the Parliament by the Treasurer, Scott Morrison, yesterday has already been listed for review by the Senate Committee with submissions scheduled to close within less than a fortnight on 1 November.
However, while the Government’s legislation underpinning the proposed Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) resulted in dissenting views between the Government and Opposition Senators of the Committee, fewer differences are expected with respect to the BEAR.
Introducing the legislation yesterday, Morrison signalled that it was part of the Government’s efforts to obviate the need for the calling of a Royal Commission into the Banking and Financial Services industry.
“The Turnbull Government is taking action now to build an accountable, competitive and stable banking system, introducing legislation today to enact landmark financial services reform,” the Treasurer said in his introductory statement.
“The Government is bringing greater accountability to our banks, introducing tough new rules for banks and their executives that will keep their behaviour and decision making in check,” Morrison said. “Under the BEAR, banks and their senior executives and directors will be expected to conduct their business with honesty and integrity, prudence, care and diligence; deal with APRA in an open, constructive and cooperative way; and prevent matters from arising that would adversely affect the bank's reputation or hurt its customers.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
