Be sceptical of underlying profit results
Investors looking at company annual reports should dig deeper than underlying profit results and focus on real statutory profits to get a true picture of performance, an accounting firm warned.
National chartered accounting and advisory firm, William Buck, said many companies may emphasise their underlying profit results, which could mislead shareholders into believing their performance was better than the actual reported results.
The firm's audit director, Jeffrey Luckins, said underlying profit measures were usually higher than real statutory profits in the Statement of Comprehensive Income, calculated and audited as per the Australian Accounting Standards.
"The underlying profit measure is not the legal definition of profit in Australia and generally is disclosed because it represents a more favourable higher result than the real statutory profit measure," he said.
"When companies are focusing your attention on underlying profit, they are actually saying they want you to accept they have incurred exceptional items which may be one-off large or unusual transactions that have adversely affected the real statutory profit for the year."
However, Jeffrey said the real statutory profit may not always reflect the anticipated results due to reasons like impairment of assets, movement in the fair value of assets, significant foreign exchange movements, share-based payments, climate change events, litigation issues and industrial action.
"Our advice to investors is to accept the audited real statutory profit disclosures in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and then critically consider the nature and reasons for any exceptional items identified which result in a higher underlying profit result."
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Former wealth firm director Joshua Fuoco has been convicted of contempt of court, sentenced and permanently banned from being involved in financial services after breaching a 10-year ban.
In its first FY26 action, ASIC has cancelled the AFSLs of two Sydney advice firms over their failures to pay industry funding levies.
The Federal Court has made interim travel restraint orders against two Falcon Capital directors, while also freezing one director’s assets.
For the 2025 financial year, all but one listed advice licensee has reported double-digit share price growth – but which licensee has seen the best performance and what activities have they enacted during the period?
