Be careful what you switch for: FPA
Switching for switching’s sake in the new choice of funds environment has been discouraged by the Financial Planning Association (FPA), which claimed last week that in the majority of cases there is nothing wrong with most peoples’ existing super funds.
The comments came from the chair of the FPA’s superannuation committee, Louise Biti, who also predicted that few people would change funds when choice was introduced.
Nevertheless, Biti expressed fear that because of recent media attention surrounding the issue, some members would almost feel obligated to change funds as soon as choice was introduced and could end up losing insurance cover or incurring higher fees.
Biti, whose comments come amidst intense scrutiny by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission of advisers who recommend clients switch funds, said consumers should not base important decisions on what they were told in commercials or “conversations at work around the water cooler”.
“It is only if they have researched the various options thoroughly and found that their fund does not compare well with other funds that are available, or does not meet their specific needs, that change should be considered,” she said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
