Banned adviser used mother’s name
THE Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has permanently banned Martin James Donohue from acting as a representative of a securities dealer or investment adviser, and from providing any financial service.
According to ASIC, in December 2000, Donohue, a Victorian-based adviser who was an authorised representative of Shaw Stockbroking, opened a client trading account in his mother’s name, and actively traded in shares and options, despite the fact his mother did not authorise the opening or trading of the account.
Shaw Stockbroking then notified Donohue between May and June 2002 that the margin collateral in the account was insufficient to cover the exposure from the account’s options trading, and requested Donohue have his client rectify the situation.
ASIC found that Donohue then forged the signature of his stepmother, who operated a legitimate trading account with Shaw Stockbroking, authorising shares valued at $120,000 to be used as collateral against the losses on the account that Donohue had opened in his mother’s name. Donohue’s stepmother was unaware of the use of her shares as collateral.
Shaw Stockbroking terminated Donohue’s employment in September 2002 when it became aware of his conduct.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
