Banks, planners face further RC grilling

Banking-Royal-Commission/superannuation/

3 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Royal Commission has not finished scrutinising the banks, with letters to some superannuation funds suggesting it intends questioning the degree to which financial planning commissions have impacted member balances.

The Royal Commission also appears set to investigate the role of financial planners with respect to corporate superannuation funds.

A letter from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, a copy of which has been obtained by Money Management, has revealed a focus on “commission and contribution arrangements” and relationships with financial planners.

The Royal Commission letter has asked the funds to “set out any commission arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE [superannuation] licensee (or any group of which they are part) or the fund and any financial planning or wealth management entity”.

It also asks that this information include “the percentage of commission paid, when such commission is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the payment, including where in part”.

“Where applicable, identify those arrangements which are known as trailing commissions and the circumstances in which those commissions are charged,” the letter said.

It also asks the funds to identify the total number of members, and the percentage of total members, of the fund who are currently paying fees for commissions to financial advisers employed by, or who are authorised representatives of the RSE Licensee.

“For those members who are subject to commissions, identify the source from which those commissions are paid (for example: from the member’s account, from the return on investment or otherwise),” the letter said.

The document also asks funds to “set out any contribution arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE Licensee (or any group of which they are a part), the fund or any employer-sponsor, and any financial planning or wealth management entity or third party, including the percentage of contribution paid, when and to which entity or person such a contribution is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the contribution, including where in part”.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo