Banks, planners face further RC grilling

Banking-Royal-Commission/superannuation/

3 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Royal Commission has not finished scrutinising the banks, with letters to some superannuation funds suggesting it intends questioning the degree to which financial planning commissions have impacted member balances.

The Royal Commission also appears set to investigate the role of financial planners with respect to corporate superannuation funds.

A letter from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, a copy of which has been obtained by Money Management, has revealed a focus on “commission and contribution arrangements” and relationships with financial planners.

The Royal Commission letter has asked the funds to “set out any commission arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE [superannuation] licensee (or any group of which they are part) or the fund and any financial planning or wealth management entity”.

It also asks that this information include “the percentage of commission paid, when such commission is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the payment, including where in part”.

“Where applicable, identify those arrangements which are known as trailing commissions and the circumstances in which those commissions are charged,” the letter said.

It also asks the funds to identify the total number of members, and the percentage of total members, of the fund who are currently paying fees for commissions to financial advisers employed by, or who are authorised representatives of the RSE Licensee.

“For those members who are subject to commissions, identify the source from which those commissions are paid (for example: from the member’s account, from the return on investment or otherwise),” the letter said.

The document also asks funds to “set out any contribution arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE Licensee (or any group of which they are a part), the fund or any employer-sponsor, and any financial planning or wealth management entity or third party, including the percentage of contribution paid, when and to which entity or person such a contribution is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the contribution, including where in part”.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

1 day 7 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5