Banks incapable of acting in member’s best interests
“For profit” superannuation funds, particularly those owned by the banks, should not be eligible to be default funds, according to key industry fund covering the nursing and health sector, HESTA.
HESTA has used its submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into superannuation industry competition and efficiency to argue for the exclusion of profit-driven superannuation funds because such an approach means then cannot be trusted to act in member’s best interests.
“HESTA believes that in a mature retirement system, businesses should not be able to profit from unengaged consumers and inert money, therefore profit seeking funds should be excluded from the safety net considerations,” the submission said.
“It is impossible to contemplate this important overarching criteria ever being met by profit-seeking funds in a mature system,” it said.
“HESTA recommends that the commission should strongly consider the appropriateness of these businesses being allowed to compete for the provision of a safety net fund at all and we believe the filter should reflect this.”
The industry funds submission claimed: “member’s best interest cannot truly be met by entities such as banks who seek to use inert money from unengaged consumers to build profits through their vertically integrated businesses”.
“Member’s best interest is the most important criteria to be considered when assessing the role of safety net fund providers,” the HESTA submission said. “Profit seeking funds have continually acted contrary to this objective.”
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
