Bad news for banks
Australia’s major banks should not feel too sanguine about holding onto customers, with a new survey released today revealing that 80 per cent said they would be prepared to switch to a new financial services provider.
The survey of more than 26,000 retail bank customers, launched today by Fujitsu Consulting, titled ‘Toxic servicing: eroding profitability in the financial services sector’, cited poor servicing (31 per cent) as the number one frustration among financial services customers — three times greater than the next biggest frustration, which is complex terms and conditions (10 per cent).
Commenting on the survey outcome, Martin North, managing consulting director, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand, said: “Contrary to what many financial services businesses assume, price is not the primary driver of customer churn”.
“Our research shows that, in reality, poor service is the number one ‘toxic’ issue driving customer churn in the financial services industry,” he said.
“Despite significant inertia, customers who are exposed to toxic servicing are highly likely to switch providers.”
North said examples of toxic servicing include being passed around a call centre, having the phone put down on them, poor product knowledge among branch staff and hidden fees and charges.
As a result of these issues, 80 per cent of survey respondents said they would consider switching banks, while 26 per cent said they would switch to find a better rate and 23 per cent were looking for better service.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
