Australians should not bow to US lobbyists against class action
Class Action Australia has warned that if Australian leading class action law firms bow to the US Chamber of Commerce’s lobbying against class actions, this may end up depriving regular Australians of access to justice.
The representatives of law firms, who appeared before a parliamentary inquiry, included Maurice Blackburn, Slater and Gordon, and Shine, and according to Class Actions Australia, all these firms were members of the Keep Corporations Honest campaign.
Class Actions Australia spokesperson, Ben Hardwick, described how the interference of the US lobby was concerning after MP Jason Falinski challenged the suggestion that Treasurer Josh Frydenberg had met with the US Chamber of Commerce just days before announcing draconian new regulation of class action funding.
“We know the US Chamber of Commerce is lobbying furiously to reduce the impact of Australian class actions because they don’t like their multinational members, like Johnson and Johnson, being sued by regular Australians. It is important to recognise this and fight it. The pernicious influence of big money American-style business lobbying should have no place in Australian politics,” Hardwick said.
Shine Lawyers head of litigation and loss recovery, Jan Saddler, told the inquiry that litigation funding was a crucial part of the class action system and stressed that class actions litigation was expensive to conduct both for the plaintiffs and the defendants for many reasons.
“The disputes are almost always contested and involve all parties expending many millions of dollars in legal costs prosecuting and defending the issues in dispute,” Saddler said.
“There is the risk that if unsuccessful, the other parties costs, are payable. Quite simply, without the support of litigation funders, Shine would not be able to act for as many well deserving Australians as it does.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
