Australian Investors' Association criticises advisers' education levels

financial advisers FPA financial planning fpa chief executive commissions parliamentary joint committee financial planners australian investors chief executive

7 May 2009
| By Benjamin Levy |
image
image
expand image

The education levels required of financial advisers to provide complex financial advice are unacceptably low, particularly for older financial advisers, according to the Australian Investors’ Association (AIA).

The AIA criticised the education levels of financial advisers in a submission to the parliamentary joint committee on corporations and financial services, saying there is an urgent need to “upgrade” current financial advisers.

Despite efforts by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) to raise the levels of education for financial advisers, there is a large group of financial planners who are “very underqualified to give the complex sort of advice needed to survive in the investment markets,” the submission stated.

Financial planners must complete five post-graduate subjects on top of a pre-existing diploma in financial planning to earn Certified Financial Planning status in the FPA.

John Prowse, the managing director of Pinnacle Academy, said that it was a “common mistake” for people to think training can fix everything in the world.

Any difficulties with financial advisers are related to their commission arrangements and supervision, rather than their education, Prowse said. There are structural faults in the financial advice system, when advice based on commissions is about selling a managed fund to a client, and not about teaching them to “cut their credit cards in half” and put more into their super.

This is not a training matter, it’s the way the industry is structured, he said.

ASIC needs to enforce the existing standards of education, but increasing them won’t achieve anything, he said.

FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the FPA requires a practitioner to have a minimum RG 146 qualification level and a minimum number of professional development (PD) hours. She said that while there may be older members who received their qualifications some time ago, their continuing PD days would certainly accommodate any issues.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

1 month ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

1 month ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 2 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has released the percentage of candidates who passed its August financial advice exam with the volume dropping to the lowest since November 2022....

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS