Australia worst of G10 currencies: HSBC
The Australian dollar presents the least appealing investment opportunity of any of the G10 currencies this year, according to an HSBC report.
The report was produced assuming that the euro would not break up and no countries would leave the euro. This belief was based on factors including a strong political will to make the euro a long-term success and a likelihood for the euro to continue showing resilience due to its strong external position, according to HSBC.
The Australian dollar was rated the worst of the G10 currencies because it is strongly overvalued, and will likely average well below parity against the US dollar in 2012, according to HSBC. Global risks and slowing growth in Australia's Asian trading partners also recently resulted in easing policy, with further rate cuts likely.
The currency has also been strongly correlated with the "risk on-risk off" factor for some time, and once the eurozone news flow begins to stabilise the "risk off" dynamics will push the Australian dollar lower, HSBC stated.
The Norwegian Krone was one of the best rated G10 currencies. It is regarded as a true safe haven due to factors including "a large current account surplus, a low sovereign risk profile, and a budgetary position which is second to none."
The Canadian dollar was also preferred as the best option when taking liquidity constraints into consideration. Although it is trading near fair value, it has a strong fiscal position and a stable financial system, with twice the turnover of the Swedish Krona, HSBC stated.
In Asia HSBC favoured China, Singapore and Malaysia while avoiding India and Indonesia. Columbia and Brazil provided the best opportunities in Latin America, with Argentina and Chile at the other end of the scale. In emerging Europe HSBC preferred Turkey and Hungary but avoided the Czech koruna.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
