Australia and NZ at bottom of class


Australia could only manage a ‘C’ and New Zealand a ‘D minus’ in a Morningstar study measuring best practices in funds management across 16 countries.
The best-rated country was the US with an ‘A’ followed by China with a ‘B plus’, while the United Kingdom scored a ‘C plus’ and New Zealand trailed the field with a D.
Commenting on the results, Morningstar’s head of adviser and research, Anthony Serhan, said the company’s researchers had scored countries in six categories — investor protection, prospectuses and investors’ reports, transparency in sales practices and the media, fees and expenses, taxation and distribution practices.
He said the survey had represented a big task and emphasised that rather than focusing on the grades, the important issue was identifying global best practice.
The US had received an A in the areas of prospectuses and investors’ reports and fees and expenses, while Australia had received a C and, while ranking relatively poorly, had performed well with respect to distribution and choice and transparency in sales and media.
The research showed that transparency in prospectuses and reports had been the main areas where Australia did not stack up, and it was noted that Australia and New Zealand were the only countries in the study that did not require full portfolio holdings disclosure on a regular basis.
It said New Zealand scored worst because of low grades for prospectuses and investors’ reports and taxation.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.