Australia and NZ at bottom of class
Australia could only manage a ‘C’ and New Zealand a ‘D minus’ in a Morningstar study measuring best practices in funds management across 16 countries.
The best-rated country was the US with an ‘A’ followed by China with a ‘B plus’, while the United Kingdom scored a ‘C plus’ and New Zealand trailed the field with a D.
Commenting on the results, Morningstar’s head of adviser and research, Anthony Serhan, said the company’s researchers had scored countries in six categories — investor protection, prospectuses and investors’ reports, transparency in sales practices and the media, fees and expenses, taxation and distribution practices.
He said the survey had represented a big task and emphasised that rather than focusing on the grades, the important issue was identifying global best practice.
The US had received an A in the areas of prospectuses and investors’ reports and fees and expenses, while Australia had received a C and, while ranking relatively poorly, had performed well with respect to distribution and choice and transparency in sales and media.
The research showed that transparency in prospectuses and reports had been the main areas where Australia did not stack up, and it was noted that Australia and New Zealand were the only countries in the study that did not require full portfolio holdings disclosure on a regular basis.
It said New Zealand scored worst because of low grades for prospectuses and investors’ reports and taxation.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
