Aussies choose unhappiness for money
Almost half of Australian couples would sacrifice happiness for money, according to a Slater and Gordon family law survey.
The survey of 2000 people in a committed relationship had 48 per cent saying they would consider staying in an unhappy union if it provided financial security. Three per cent said they were currently in this situation.
Almost one-third of respondents said they almost never or only infrequently discussed their financial position, including their bills and debts, with their partner.
Slater and Gordon family lawyer, Heather McKinnon, said financial problems were among the most common causes of marriage breakdowns, and as they prepare to lodge their annual tax returns it is the perfect time to have an honest conversation about their finances.
"It's important that both parties have an understanding of their finances and work together so that one of them does not feel like the other has all the control or that they are being locked out of financial decisions," she said.
"In family law, the general principle of ‘what's mine is yours, what's yours is mine and what's ours is ours' applies — in other words any property or assets owned by the couple, whether individually or jointly, will be taken into account if a couple splits up."
McKinnon said there were two ways that property and assets could be divided up — either through a negotiated settlement reached by mutual agreement or through the Family Court if agreement could not be reached.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
