ATO defines ‘financial assistance’

self-managed superannuation funds australian taxation office taxation SMSFs accountant ATO smsf trustees superannuation industry super funds director

29 August 2008
| By George Liondis |

Trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) could unwittingly break the law by helping fellow members financially, according to a new Australian Taxation Office (ATO) ruling.

GMK Centric taxation director Chris Wookey said the ATO had issued the new ruling prohibiting a fund giving financial assistance to members.

“Under the SIS Act [Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act], trustees of a SMSF are prohibited from providing financial assistance to members or their relatives using the fund’s assets,” he said.

“The ATO has defined what is financial assistance, including indirect benefits.”

Wookey said people had always been tempted to raid super funds for cash, but there were some other areas, such as being the guarantor for a loan, which would create a breach under the new ruling.

He said while such breaches are not common, SMSF trustees have been reminded of the effect of the ruling given the financial pressures many are facing.

“If a member took out a loan and the fund became guarantor, this would be [a] breach,” he said.

“It is not something that would appear on the financial statements of the fund, thereby making it hard to pick up by [an] accountant or auditor.”

Wookey said an accountant would have to request documents from the member about the loan if they suspected this had happened.

“This makes the role of the accountant or auditor more risky when signing off saying a fund is compliant,” he said.

“People will need to ask more questions and get certification letters from their clients to make sure this isn’t happening.”

The ruling has defined other prohibited forms of assistance, such as selling an asset to a member at less than its market value or handing it over as a gift.

“The fund could also pay an inflated price for a service provided by a member, and again this is prohibited under this ruling,” Wookey said.

“Another breach is when the fund releases a member from a financial obligation owed to the SMSF.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS