ATO criticised on super surcharge admin
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) has criticised the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) over its administration of the superannuation contributions surcharge, pointing to a range of important deficiencies.
In an audit report tabled this week, the ANAO said that the ATO’s administration of the surcharge “had not been managed well and pointed to deficiencies relating to past surcharge governance arrangement, systems, processes and controls and surcharge compliance.
In making the criticisms, the ANAO acknowledged that the ATO had been presented with a difficult challenge involving a complex collection mechanism and the pressures which had flowed from amendments to the surcharge legislation and the introduction of tax reforms.
As well, the ANAO said there had been a reduction in ATO funding for the surcharge.
Seventeen recommendations have flowed from the ANAO’s adverse report including better planning and risk management, improved procedures and systems documentation and the development of a robust surcharge compliance framework.
In responding to the ANAO report, the ATO said overseeing the surcharge had been one of its most difficult challenges, because of the environment in which it had been introduced.
It said that at the time of the surcharge introduction the ATO had been under considerable pressure, implementing numerous amendments to the superannuation legislation and the introduction of a major tax reform program.
“The ATO has not performed to the high standard the community expects,” the ATO’s response said. “The ATO is dedicated to addressing these shortcomings and has made significant progress to ensure they do not recur.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
