ATO clamps down on ‘wash sales’
Chartered accountants GMK Centric has warned financial advisers to take note of the latest round of ‘wash sale’ decisions to be issued by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) coinciding with year-end tax planning.
GMK Centric taxation director Chris Wookey said the ATO intends to apply the general anti-avoidance provisions of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 to a number of arrangements known collectively as ‘wash sales’ due to the perception of them having little commercial rationale.
According to a January 2008 tax ruling and April 2008 taxpayer alert, the ATO believes that if a taxpayer sells a parcel of shares on the Australian Securities Exchange only to buy them back within 24 hours, such an action was only explicable by a dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit and was potentially changeable using Part IVA.
“The ATO is not seeking to attack outright sales and genuine disposal of assets at market value,” Wookey said.
“Rather, it is targeting situations where economic ownership is effectively retained.”
Wookey said advisers who have advocated such wash sales could be prosecuted under the promoter penalty regime, with fines of up to $550,000 for individuals and $2.75 million for companies.
“Clients and advisers will need to take care not to undertake what may have been a traditional tax planning action when reviewing their 2008 tax affairs in the lead up to June 30.”
Recommended for you
AZ NGA’s CEO has unpacked how its recent $345 million debt facility from Barings will accelerate its advice network’s growth ambitions, and allow its largest firms to access a greater source of funding.
Research by Colonial First State has found women are reluctant to make retirement preparations, despite 62 per cent saying they feel that they are unable to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Managed accounts saw net inflows of $14.3 billion in the six months to 31 December, according to the latest IMAP FUM census.
The increased bids for Insignia from Bain and CC Capital value the company at $3.3 billion, while there is still a possibility for competing bids from rival players such as Brookfield.
