ATO backs planners in tax advice tug-of-war

australian taxation office income tax taxation financial planner financial planning financial planners financial services reform financial planning association ATO australian securities and investments commission FPA

9 July 2004
| By Rebecca Evans |

By Rebecca Evans

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) in consultation with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is unlikely not to regulate ‘incidental’ tax advice given by financial planners, after releasing a draft taxation determination investigating the current provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Act.

However, the law does not prevent a person in a non-representational capacity from giving tax advice that is part of, or incidental to, another service. The ATO considers a non-representational capacity to be that where tax advice is secondary to the core duties of the service provider, such as a financial planner.

Taxpayers Australia’s national director Peter McDonald says the clarification of paragraph 251l(1)(b) is another example of an industry carve out where the spirit of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) is ignored.

“I’m not convinced that tax advice is incidental, it forms an intrinsic part of the (financial planning) process,” McDonald says.

“There’s something horribly wrong with a system where you can have tax advice that is basically unregulated,” he says.

Financial Planning Association (FPA) acting policy manager Joan Simpson agrees that tax advice is an integral part of financial planning, but strongly disagrees that this gives planners a licence to advise without consequences.

“Financial planners are not only able to give that advice, but are held accountable under the FSRA. There are both civil and criminal penalties that may apply in relation to the work they do,” Simpson says.

She says planners are expected to offer holistic advice, and it is absurd to suggest broad tax advice is not a part of their role.

“A client who sees a financial planner hasn’t come primarily for tax advice, but regardless, the financial planner must consider taxation implications,” Simpson says.

The ATO determination reports that under existing law, persons other than registered tax agents are prohibited from charging a fee for “giving advice about a taxation law on behalf of a taxpayer”.

Section 251l(b) was originally enacted to provide an assurance to both the taxpayer and the ATO that a person authorised to act on behalf of the taxpayer is reputable and competent in income tax matters.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

16 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 6 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago