ASIC's short-selling ban came at a cost

australian securities and investments commission government and regulation research and ratings ASIC global financial crisis investments commission

25 September 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A review of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) ban on short-selling imposed at the height of the global financial crisis has concluded the ban may have contributed to adverse market characteristics but was probably justified in the circumstances.

The adverse market characteristics, strongly remarked upon by market participants at the time, included reduced liquidity and increased price volatility and increased compliance costs for many firms.

However, discussing the release of the report this week, ASIC deputy chairman Belinda Gibson noted the ban had been implemented in exceptional circumstances.

"While these effects would normally run counter to our objectives, the review concludes that the exceptional circumstances at the time - a market that was under severe strain because of unprecedented global events - were justified in order to reduce the risk of greater disorder," she said.

Further, Gibson signaled that if the same circumstances were repeated in the future "it is likely that ASIC and the Australian Government would again contemplate a ban on short-selling to bolster investor confidence and limit the potential for international regulatory arbitrage".

"Over the past three years, ASIC together with other regulators and the market have developed a much deeper understanding of short-selling and its impact on trading conditions, and any future calls for taking measures similar to those of September 2008 would have the benefit of the lessons learned from the 2008 bans," she said.

The impact of the short-selling ban on the Australian market was outlined in University of NSW research contained within the ASIC report, which said the ban had significantly reduced the trading activity of Australian financial stocks.

It said that, specifically, the average turnover of Australian financial stocks during the period of the ban declined by more than 40 per cent compared with the pre-ban period, which contrasted  with much smaller reductions in turnover in the study's control group of equivalent Canadian stocks that were subject to only a very brief short selling ban.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS