ASIC's Peter Kell outlines code of conduct requirements

peter-kell/ASIC/financial-advice-industry/financial-services-council/FOFA/association-of-financial-advisers/corporations-act/financial-advisers/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/AFA/FSC/

1 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Compliant industry codes of conduct deemed to obviate the need to comply with opt-in requirements will have to meet a hefty set of criteria, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) commissioner Peter Kell.

Speaking at a Financial Services Council (FSC) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) post-FOFA breakfast this morning, Kell said he expected multiple codes to be submitted and it was not ASIC's place to take a view on who should be able to submit a code, although he expected submitters to be representative bodies of the financial advice industry.

Codes will need to comply with the Corporations Act, will need to be reviewed regularly, and provide guidelines to members over and above what is contained in the legislation.

They need to be free-standing documents written in plain English and need to be enforceable on members, Kell said.

They will need to be independently administered with ongoing review, and member compliance with the codes to be monitored and enforced with appropriate sanctions, he said.

"We expect the code to address issues not contained within the legislation, and clearly explain to members what needs to be done to comply with legislation," he said. "In other words - they must be taken seriously," he said. 

Kell expected the codes would take time to develop and ASIC would take weeks or months to assess each one. 

Responding to a question from the audience, Kell said it was unlikely that industry codes of conduct would be required to incorporate a ban on asset-based fees on non-geared investments.

ASIC does not wish to see codes put forward without adequate input from stakeholders.Codes should address other aspects of FOFA besides opt-in, he added.

To obviate the need for opt-in codes should require an obligation to clients that will achieve the same results as opt-in, including that clients are not paying for advice they do not receive, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

3 days 20 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5