ASIC's MDA class order needs a review: IMAP

ASIC financial adviser investments commission australian securities and investments commission chairman

8 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The 2004 class order issued under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) managed discretionary account (MDA) policy needs to be reviewed to better clarify what activity is permitted within a regulated platform as opposed to a full MDA authorisation.

That's the assessment of Toby Potter, chairman of the Institute of Managed Account Providers (IMAP), who recently met with the regulator to discuss the progress of the MDA Consultation Paper, which he said he expects will be released some time before the year's end.

The current model of a financial adviser providing a discretionary management service through a platform is not well captured in the class order, he said.

Potter added that some of the reporting requirements under the no-action letter are redundant, due to the fact that custody arrangements and regular reporting requirements are usually met by the existence of a platform.

"The issues for us are making sure that the regulations reflect current practices in administration and platform technology," he said.

According to The Fold Legal managing director Claire Wivell-Platter, ASIC seems to be of the view that the no-action letter was limited to rebalancing portfolios, whereas she understands that financial advisers have been using the class order to provide a more widespread discretionary management service.

"I believe the reason for this is at the time the letter was issued, equities weren't readily available on platforms, but since then they have been," she said.

"It's conceivable that the terms of the no-action letter are wide enough, because it does not specifically say that the activities should be limited to rebalancing."

With such a lack of clarity around the MDA authorisation, Wivell-Platter suggests that the regulator introduce a limited authorisation to discretionary services provided on a platform, since an adviser would already meet the administrative and reporting requirements under the no-action letter.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS