ASIC’s damning assessment of CFP’s former culture

commonwealth financial planning FOFA ASIC financial planning CFP peter kell parliamentary joint committee enforceable undertaking financial advice australian securities and investments commission federal court

24 June 2013
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Conflicts of interest, arising from commission-based payments, were at the heart of the problems with Commonwealth Financial Planning (CFP), according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Further, ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell has told the Parliamentary Joint Committee which will be reviewing ASIC's performance with respect to CFP and other financial services organisations, that implementation of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes will go some way towards addressing those issues.

He said the media had been right to shine a light on the conduct five years ago of CFP "because it reminds the public how far we have come in changing financial planning".

"There was unacceptable and unlawful conduct at CFP. Clients were given inappropriate advice and many suffered badly because of it.

"And that is exactly why ASIC took serious enforcement action. Our actions:

* had seven advisers banned;

* set up a compensation system that will result in 1127 customers receiving around $50 million. There are around 37 cases yet to be resolved; and

* forced CFP into an enforceable undertaking that required the group to change completely the way it does business."

Kell said CFP had been a complex matter and "cases like this involve much background work before a public result is achieved. That is how law enforcement works. ASIC has to also carefully assess information presented to us and make judgments about what would stand up in court".

"On the topic of whistleblowers, we cannot and will not discuss whistleblower involvement in any particular case," he said. "If ASIC revealed these details it would compromise the integrity of our whistleblower policy and deter people coming forward," Kell said.

"What person would approach ASIC if they suspected we might discuss their case with a newspaper reporter? In fact, we go out of our way to protect whistleblowers and several years ago successfully fought a case in the Federal Court to conceal someone's identity."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

4 days 22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS