ASIC urges planners to review research arrangements

financial planners financial planning funds management research and ratings ASIC australian securities and investments commission peter kell

3 September 2013
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has urged financial planners to reassess the business and payment models of their funds management research houses and to also examine how they produce managed fund ratings.

ASIC has sent the reminder to the advisory profession as all research providers are required to comply with updated conditions under Regulatory Guide 79 (RG79) ‘Research report providers: Improving the quality of investment research', from September 1 2013.

ASIC stated that "not all research is the same and nor is each research provider" and financial planners should test the market and re-evaluate the business models of research providers. Planners were also encouraged to check the ability of research houses to handle conflicts of interest; how they produce ratings; and what they mean.

ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said a highly rated product was not an indication that it would be suitable for every client. He said financial advisers were still responsible for advice, but investment research was an important ingredient in formulating quality advice.

"To make this assessment, we encourage all advice providers to do their due diligence on their third party research provider to ensure that quality inputs go into their advice businesses," Kell said.

Planners should ask about the level of experience and turnover of research provider staff as well as the selection and ratings criteria for products being rated. They should also examine the service offering and ensure communications were clear and the research demonstrated a measure of quality control.

ASIC released the updated RG79 in December last year which directed research providers to manage any conflicts of interest and to outline the quality, robustness and transparency of their research processes.

When speaking with Money Management in May, the research houses typically used by financial planners indicated they had been ready for the updated RG79 conditions well in advance of the 1 September start date.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

6 days 12 hours ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

4 days 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS