ASIC urged to be specific
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been told it needs to be more specific when providing case studies of conflicts of interest.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called on ASIC to include more specifics in the case studies it is proposing to include in regulations dealing with conflicts of interest.
In a submission to ASIC responding to the regulator’s discussion paper dealing with managing conflicts of interest in the financial services industry, ASFA expressed concern that the examples used by ASIC were “very simple and not practical in addressing often highly complex business situations”.
The submission, developed by ASFA’s director of policy and research Dr Michaela Anderson, said many of the examples were, in the first instance, a breach of a specific requirement of the law, rather than about management of conflicts.
“The loosely based case studies used have the potential to become benchmarks imposed on the industry by regulators and auditors for a ‘one size fits all’ approach, which should not be supported,” the submission said.
ASFA said rather than case studies, ASIC should be providing more specific guidance on how the principles might be implemented in practice.
Recommended for you
Despite the year almost at an end, advisers have been considerably active in licensee switching this week while the profession has reported a slight uptick in numbers.
AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity.
BT has kicked off its second annual Career Pathways Program in partnership with Striver, almost doubling its intake from the inaugural program last year.
Kaplan has launched a six-week intensive program to start in January, targeting advisers who are unlikely to meet the education deadline but intend to return to the profession once they do.
