ASIC urged to be specific
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been told it needs to be more specific when providing case studies of conflicts of interest.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called on ASIC to include more specifics in the case studies it is proposing to include in regulations dealing with conflicts of interest.
In a submission to ASIC responding to the regulator’s discussion paper dealing with managing conflicts of interest in the financial services industry, ASFA expressed concern that the examples used by ASIC were “very simple and not practical in addressing often highly complex business situations”.
The submission, developed by ASFA’s director of policy and research Dr Michaela Anderson, said many of the examples were, in the first instance, a breach of a specific requirement of the law, rather than about management of conflicts.
“The loosely based case studies used have the potential to become benchmarks imposed on the industry by regulators and auditors for a ‘one size fits all’ approach, which should not be supported,” the submission said.
ASFA said rather than case studies, ASIC should be providing more specific guidance on how the principles might be implemented in practice.
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
