ASIC ups disclosure for unlisted property schemes
Unlisted property schemes will be required to adhere to six new disclosure benchmarks from 1 November 2012.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Regulatory Guide 46 has been updated to include benchmarks relating to the unlisted property scheme's gearing policy, interest cover policy, interest capitalisation, valuation policy, related party transactions and distribution practices.
The scheme must disclose whether each benchmark is 'met' or 'not met', on an 'if not, why not' basis, according to RG 46.
The regulatory guide expresses ASIC's concern that unlisted property schemes often appeal to retail investors "who may believe that the investment offers capital stability and consistent ongoing returns that are not likely to vary significantly".
ASIC commissioner Greg Tanzer warned that while "many Australians like to invest in real estate", unlisted property schemes "carry risks as well as opportunities".
"It's necessary to ensure investors have the information they need to make informed investment decisions, as inadequate disclosure can contribute to investors not understanding the risks," Tanzer said.
Responsible entities must also ensure that the advertising of unlisted property schemes is consistent with the disclosure of the new benchmarks in the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).
Additionally, any investment rating used in the advertising must be issued by a research house with an Australian financial services licence, and must not mislead consumers, according to RG 46.
Responsible entities must disclose the benchmarks and the new principles to investors by 1 November 2012, and new PDSs after 1 November 2012 must include "prominent and clear disclosure" of the benchmarks.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
