ASIC: Trails equate to ongoing fees
While the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has argued that grandfathered trail commissions do not equate to ongoing service arrangements, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has argued that they do.
ASIC has used its submission responding to the first-round financial advice hearings of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services industry to describe ongoing service fees as having “some similarities to commissions, in that they are recurring, are practically ‘invisible’ to the customer and may bear no relation to the work actually done”.
“In ASIC’s view, it is plausible that a continuing culture among licensees and advisers of receiving ongoing commissions which bear no direct relationship to the provision by them of service to the customer (a culture condoned to at least some extent by the grandfathering of commissions) may have contributed to those licensees and advisers paying insufficient regard to the need to charge ongoing service fees only where the service was provided,” the submission said.
On the question of whether the grandfathered arrangements should cease, ASIC said any exception to the ban on conflicted remuneration had the ability to create misaligned incentives which could lead to inappropriate advice.
Further, the regulator pointed out that it had always been opposed to the grandfathering arrangements under the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) changes being allowed to continue in perpetuity.
It said that ASIC was concerned that almost five years after the implementation of the FoFA reforms, grandfathered commissions continued to form a significant proportion of licensee/adviser remuneration and that grandfathered commissions “operate to incentivise advisers to keep clients in legacy products with a continuing commission structure, even where there may be better products available to meet the client’s needs”.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
