ASIC toughens licensing process
Australian financial services licensees (AFSLs) and Australian credit licensees lodging licence applications to the corporate regulator can expect a more rigorous approach to assessing applications but guidelines on the exact requirements are not available yet, according to The Fold Legal.
Senior consultant, Sonia Cruz, wrote in a blog that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) would reject applications after the initial check if any component was missing in the licensing applications, which could take up to four weeks. This would then need to be resubmitted, causing significant delays in having applications assessed.
"So before lodging your application, carefully check all the material you submit in support of your application to ensure everything required by ASIC's AFS licensing kits is included," Cruz wrote.
She also said that since 2013, ASIC had been able to reject applications if it believed the applicant could contravene the financial or credit services laws in the future.
Applicants can also expect ASIC to conduct rigorous background checks to look for past misconduct, particularly deliberate or wilful disregard of financial or credit services laws.
However, Cruz noted that while ASIC said it May it would update the AFS Licensing Kit (RG 1-3) to specify its new approach to assessing applicants on if they contravened the law, it had not yet released any guidance.
ASIC's timeframe was currently 60 days for simple applications but Cruz said it could take four months.
"And the situation seems unlikely to improve. In ASIC's 2016—17 Corporate Plan, only four per cent of the total budget of $400 million has been allocated to licensing and professional registrations," Cruz said.
ASIC may also ask for materials applicants may use under the licence include a financial services guide or statements of advice.
"It's difficult to predict what they might ask for, so it's advisable to have your operating procedures and disclosure documents ready when applying for your licence," Cruz said.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
Lower fees and trustworthiness are the top factors enticing unadvised Australians to seek a financial adviser, according to Fidelity International, common across all generations.
