ASIC targets misuse of ‘general advice’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1031/f103193a6e205a7c8fbb2d9ddc4dfea019570a8c" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1031/f103193a6e205a7c8fbb2d9ddc4dfea019570a8c" alt="image"
Australian Financial Services license (AFSL) holders who misuse the provision of general advice to retail clients will find themselves being scrutinised by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
The regulator has signalled its intention in its latest Enforcement Outcome Review report where it listed the misuse of general advice as an issue to which it would be paying particular attention over the next six months.
ASIC specifically cited “instances where AFS licensees claim to provide general advice to retail clients during the sale of financial products (and therefore do not need to comply with the best interests duty and related obligations), but are actually providing personal advice”.
Importantly, ASIC said it would also be paying particular attention to financial adviser compliance with the best interests duty and “their obligation to provide appropriate advice to clients.”
ASIC also signalled that it would be continuing the activity which gave rise to its so-called “fee for no service” report, stating that it would examining any failure by AFSLs to deliver ongoing advice services to financial advice customers who are paying fees to receive those services.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.