ASIC sues OnePath for fee-for-no-service
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b738/6b7380cfea24ab15235d88fa726082bbbd3b1158" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b738/6b7380cfea24ab15235d88fa726082bbbd3b1158" alt="image"
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil penalty proceedings against superannuation trustee OnePath Custodians for allegedly charging fee-for-no-service and making false and misleading representations to fund members.
According to the regulator, OnePath allegedly incorrectly charged over $4 million in fees to more than 18,000 fund members when it was not entitled to do so.
ASIC also alleged that from 15 December, 2015, OnePath charged financial advice service fees totalling $3,787,966.21 to 16,210 members who had been de-linked from their employer-sponsored superannuation plans.
Additionally, OnePath allegedly sent these members letters and annual statements until about May 2020 which failed to inform them of their rights regarding adviser service fees, including their right to terminate the fees.
Further to that, from December 2015 until about January 2019, OnePath incorrectly charged financial adviser service fees totalling $502,667.18 to 2,508 members who did not have a linked plan adviser, ASIC said.
According to ASIC, OnePath allegedly sent annual statements to these members until about October 2019 representing it was entitled to deduct adviser service fees from their accounts and that they were obliged to pay.
ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said: “Superannuation is important for the future financial security of Australians. Consumers must be able to trust they are being charged fees correctly by their superannuation providers. ASIC’s case alleges that OnePath failed to do so in this case”.
ASIC would be seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and other orders from the Federal Court.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.