ASIC should take a back seat

financial-planning/financial-planning-industry/parliamentary-joint-committee/financial-services-reform/financial-services-industry/government/cooper-review/money-management/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/FPA/chief-executive/treasury/

3 December 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Government and the Treasury, rather than the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), should lead the way in implementing changes to the financial planning industry, according to the chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch.

Speaking in the wake of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (Ripoll Inquiry), Bloch told Money Management there was a danger ASIC, as a busy regulator with an already heavy workload, would come up with overly complex and costly solutions.

She warned that the last thing the industry needed to flow from the recommendations of the Ripoll Inquiry and the Cooper Review was a repeat of the complexity and costliness that evolved as a result of the implementation of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) nearly a decade ago.

“On that basis we would be hoping that the Government is not taking too much notice of the academics and lawyers who have been seeking to buy into the debate without properly understanding the workings of our industry,” Bloch said.

She said the Ripoll Inquiry recommendations had laid the framework for practical outcomes that did not need to be too complex.

“The industry, in liaison with the Government, is capable of implementing the changes,” Bloch said.

“The last thing we need at the moment is the lawyers, commentators and others trying to repeat what they did with FSRA,” she said.

Bloch said there needed to be a realisation that many of the problems which continued to affect the financial services industry had been borne of the complexity that now surrounded FSRA — a complexity that had been largely owed to academic and legal intrusion into the issue.

She said what was also required from the Government was a set of solid timeframes for the implementation of its policy agenda on financial planning.

“We need some timeframes which are practical and workable,” Bloch said. “The last thing we want is to find the industry being squeezed on what represent key issues.”

The Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen, has made clear that the Ripoll recommendations will be considered by the Government in the context of the findings of the Cooper Review into superannuation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS