ASIC seeks feedback on indirect self-acquisitions
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is seeking public comment on relief proposals that will permit certain indirect self-acquisitions by investment funds from entities such as investment banks, investment funds and insurance companies up until 30 July.
The Corporations Act states that indirect self-acquisition (where a company transfers some of its shares to an entity it controls) is void unless certain exceptions apply.
A consultation paper released by ASIC in October 1998 sought feedback about the circumstances in which the exceptions should be granted to investment funds and similar entities.
ASIC has since provided exceptions on a case-by-case basis, and has put in place a sunset clause that allows the regulator to periodically review the policy.
ASIC will now seek feedback on issues that have arisen since the 1998 paper was released, and will finalise its policy in the coming months.
Consultation Paper 137: Indirect self-acquisition by investment funds: Further consultation (CP 137) will seek feedback on several proposals.
ASIC is proposing to grant case-by-case relief without a sunset clause, because the regulator is satisfied that the policy settings and conditions in the original consultation paper are appropriate.
The regulator is also proposing additional relief for controlled trustees and responsible entities, which will limit the amount of units in the scheme or trust that can be held by controlled entities to a maximum of 20 per cent. ASIC will also seek feedback about whether there are circumstances where it may be necessary for a company to have more than a 20 per cent interest in an investment trust other than for the purpose of investing the company's own funds.
The regulator will also seek feedback on proposed relief for investment-linked statutory funds that allows: participation in the placement of a company's shares; allowing self-acquisition of shares in a listed company for the purpose of index arbitrage; and regular periodic disclosure as a condition of relief.
Recommended for you
Former wealth firm director Joshua Fuoco has been convicted of contempt of court, sentenced and permanently banned from being involved in financial services after breaching a 10-year ban.
In its first FY26 action, ASIC has cancelled the AFSLs of two Sydney advice firms over their failures to pay industry funding levies.
The Federal Court has made interim travel restraint orders against two Falcon Capital directors, while also freezing one director’s assets.
For the 2025 financial year, all but one listed advice licensee has reported double-digit share price growth – but which licensee has seen the best performance and what activities have they enacted during the period?
