ASIC says it is not baying for blood
TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission(ASIC) has reacted angrily to claims its regulation of the financial services industry is excessive.
ASIC director of FSR licensing Pauline Vamos strongly refuted comments made during last week’sAssociation of Financial Advisersconference that it was ‘a loose cannon’.
The comments followed those made byThe Argyle Partnership’s Peter Bobbin during his presentation on FSR.
He claimed ASIC has “overstepped the mark” in its regulatory activity, is “a loose cannon”, and is “baying for blood”.
Vamos responded with “we do not bay for blood, we do not go out for heads on sticks, we are there to regulate the industry”.
“We put crooks in jail, people who you do not want in your industry,” she says.
Vamos also tried to dispel adviser fears about implementing the new licensing regime, and emphasise ASIC’s role in assisting with the transition process.
“If you are deliberately misleading your clients, we will have grave concerns. If you tried to comply, then we’re going to help you out.”
Vamos defended legal action against advisers, saying ASIC is out to stop those who were acting dishonestly or unfairly.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
