ASIC satisfies most requests for FSR relief
Claiming to have no knowledge of the existence of Financial Services Reform (FSR), applying for a financial services license just days before the new regime was due to kick in and claiming to be a charitable organisation, are all excuses that have been turned down by the corporate watchdog as reasons for not complying with FSR.
The requests for leniency, form part of a series of examples contained in an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) quarterly overview of decisions on relief applications from FSR.
For the period between August 15 and December 31, 2004, ASIC received 915 applications for relief from FSR requirements, especially those related to licensing, disclosure and managed investments. Relief was granted in relation to 791 or 86 per cent of 915 applications, while the other 124 were turned down.
Some of the numerous examples of licensing situations were relief was granted included the exemption of a French investment bank that provided a range of financial services to Australian wholesale clients on the basis that the applicable foreign regulatory regimes were similar to the Australian regime, and the suspension of action against a company who’s own external auditors detected a licensing breach in a compliance audit.
Relief form providing a Product Disclosure Statement was granted to several joint issuers of non-cash payment facilities and to companies who sold Australian financial products to overseas residents.
ASIC director of regulation John Price said similar reports would be published every quarter to help financial services providers figure out what factors ASIC will take into account before granting relief from FSR.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
