ASIC review identifies licensees' remediation problems
ASIC has warned advice licensees face regulatory action if they fail to remediate customers in a timely manner.
Over the last seven years, ASIC has overseen more than $7 billion of remediation to an estimated 8.4 million Australian consumers for failures identified across the financial services industry.
The regulator's comments follow a review of the remediation policies and procedures of some large financial institutions to assess their implementation of Regulatory Guide 277 (RG277) which was written in September 2022.
The review identified gaps where some licensees’ policies and procedures were inconsistent with RG 277 and could lead to poor outcomes for customers.
Examples of problems included:
- Some policies that could inappropriately narrow the scope of remediation review periods such as the inclusion of unnecessary approval processes in order for review periods to exceed a certain number of years.
- Licensees did not always consider beneficial assumptions as a mechanism to enable efficient remediations.
- Some licensees had pre-determined rates for specific products or scenarios. It was not always clear that these were subject to adequate review and controls to ensure that they were appropriate in the circumstances.
- A general lack of focus on fairness in governance frameworks.
ASIC reminded licensees that regulatory action could include enforcement action, issuing public statements, general monitoring of the remediation process, requests for regular reporting and reviews of the licensee's design and conduct of the remediation.
ASIC deputy chair, Karen Chester, said: “RG 277 provides licensees the guidance they need to get remediation right. Licensees need to be proactive, timely and fair in their approach to consumer remediation.
“Effective remediation starts with robust, consumer-centred policies and procedures, which give licensees and their staff the confidence and ability to fully investigate the issue, triangulate the data available, discover the true root cause and scope of the problem, and respond effectively.
“Getting remediation wrong is very costly – costly to consumers who bear the burden of a financial firm’s mistakes, but also very costly for firms who have to re-do remediations and repair reputational damage.
“Going forward, while ASIC will generally not oversee remediation programs, we will consider regulatory action where licensees fail to deliver fair and timely remediation to affected consumers.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
