ASIC pursues NAB in Federal Court over fees
National Australia Bank (NAB) is again facing legal action initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) – this time over the allegedly wrongfully imposition of fees charged on period payments.
The regulator has confirmed it has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against NAB alleging that the bank charged fees for making certain periodic payments when it was not entitled to under the bank’s contracts with its customers.
ASIC said it would be alleging that between 25 February 2015 and 22 February 2019, NAB charged fees for periodic payments on at least 195,305 occasions totalling $365,454 when it was not contractually entitled to do so. These fees were charged to 4,874 personal banking customers and 913 business banking customers.
“ASIC alleges that by charging the fees, or by notifying customers of the charging of each fee via a bank statement, NAB:
- Made false or misleading representations that it was contractually entitled to charge the fees when it was not;
- Engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct; and
- Contravened its obligation as an Australian financial services licensee to comply with financial services laws.
ASIC said NAB had identified that it was charging periodic payment fees in error to both personal and business banking customers by the end of October 2016 but it took NAB until July 2018 to lodge a breach report with ASIC and notify customers of the overcharging, and to begin remediating customers.
ASIC alleges that between at least January 2017 and July 2018, NAB continued to charge customers periodic payment fees even though it knew overcharging was occurring and did not have systems to prevent those fees from being charged incorrectly. NAB did not change its systems to prevent overcharging until 22 February 2019, when it ceased to charge those fees to customers.
ASIC alleges between January 2017 and July 2018, NAB engaged in unconscionable conduct and contravened its obligations as an Australian financial services licensee to ensure that financial services covered by its licence were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly by:
- Continuing to charge periodic payment fees to customers in circumstances where it knew that it had no contractual entitlement to do so; and
- Failing to inform customers about the wrongful charging of fees, or suggest that customers review the periodic payment fees charged to their accounts.
ASIC also alleges that between 25 February 2015 and 22 February 2019, NAB failed to provide financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly by:
- Imposing periodic payment fees on customers when it had no contractual entitlement to do so; and
- Failing to have adequate systems and processes to:
- Ensure that periodic payment fee overcharging did not occur;
- Detect periodic payment fee overcharging when it did occur; and
- Identify and remediate affected customers.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
